Deprecated: mysql_connect(): The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /home/a26f9f83/public_html/articles/includes/config.php on line 159
Three Theories > NetSparsh - Viral Content you Love & Share

Three Theories

An event occurs, then there must be an antecedent event, prior to it, causing it and this event will serve as an antecedent to another event and will lead it, if this theory is agreed means then there must be a starting or beginning for everything. This theory is called "theory of causal determinism". Now let us consider an event A, is said to occur, then two type or arguments can be posted one is called 'Fatalism' and other is called 'Free will'.

The former concept is that whatever happens now, happened by, and going to happen in future is predetermined. Fatalism is the view that we are powerless to do anything other that what we actually do. It may be argued for in various ways: by appeal to logical laws and metaphysical necessities; by appeal to the existence and nature of God; by appeal to causal determinism.

When argued for in the first way, it is commonly called "Logical fatalism" when argued for in the second way, it is commonly called "Theological fatalism". When argued for in the third way it is not now commonly referred to as "fatalism" at all, and such arguments will not be discussed here.

The later concept is of Free will, is postulates that whatever happens are merely because of freewill, whatever he/she thinks he carries out and the corresponding consequences he faces. Free will is a concept in traditional philosophy used to refer to the belief that human behavior is not absolutely determined by external causes, but is the result of choices made by an act of will by the agent. Such choices are themselves not determined by external causes, but are determined by the motives and intentions of the agent, which themselves are not absolutely determined by external causes.

Sphere of discussion:

In essence, the sphere of discussion covering the subject human freedom and causal determinism has two poles. At the one is the idea that our will is 'completely free' in essence, though it may be 'conditioned' by the various different circumstances surrounding each person. At the other pole are the extreme doctrines of total fatalism or unalterable causal determinism. Other relevant standpoints fall somewhere between these 'polar extremes'.

Most thinkers in the social, historical and political sciences are found well away from the poles, as are those who contribute to some form of ordinary common sense, especially in modern and more Westernized cultures.

Fatalism:

Now let us take the side of "Fatalism". By 'fate', I mean what the Greeks call heimarmenê ? an ordering and sequence of causes, since it is the connexion of cause to cause which out of itself produces anything. It says all actions, deeds, and their results are predetermined, prewritten. If it is so then a question may arise, why all these then? why these things should happen, what is the fruit of it?. These questions remain unanswered by these people, some theologist answer these but those were not up to the desired. This type of argument is called "lazy-argument", and 'If we gave in to it,' 'we would do nothing whatever in life.'

There are two sorts of people in this side, theist and atheist. Let me put forth a question to the theist people "Every individual during his life course does action good or bad, sometimes he stays passive, if at all, it is fate then why it is he ordered or written to do a bad thing, then why should he suffer, why supreme power did him so?". No response for this from them. Now for atheist people, they say "for everything, it is like this that is all no reason for this and no one had made this like this. The argument is posed as follows: 'If it is your fate to recover from this illness, you will recover, regardless of whether or not you call the doctor. Likewise, if it is your fate not to recover from this illness, you will not recover, regardless of whether or not you call the doctor. And one or the other is your fate. Therefore it is pointless to call the doctor'. Is that right? By considering these things it is clear that "the concept of Fatalism is ruled out"

Free-will:

The second dogma is that Free will, it states that "all actions deeds & outcomes are due to free will of every individual, nothing is pre determined", and as an individual he moves according to his own will and everything is the result of his actions. Ok let me go in their way, if it is so then why should humans suffer, then why is his actions confined, why is he not opened to everything, why he is suffering most of the time, by nature no one wishes for sorrow or disasters, then why all bad happens to him. An answer can be quoted for this; it is because he is ignorant to good and bad, then what causes that ignorance, if everything is because of free will then why can't that ignorance be evacuated.

The second drawback of this concept is that "if everything is free will, then why some things remain unalterable? Why certain things are beyond his control, if so then what the line of separation is, where things go beyond control, what causes it. No answer is found yet. We can see immediately that this option is unhelpful and probably rather silly.

Co-Fated events:

Ok, if we rule out both extremes what is going on actually, if not fatalism or free will then what? Here comes the answer, all these can be categorized under Co-Fated events. By Co-Fated events what I mean is "no action is completely due to free will or due to fate, but both these giants have a hand". Now for the example quoted initially of the doctor, we can say that, Some events are complex and 'co-fated'. It is false that you will recover from the illness whether or not you call the doctor, because you're calling the doctor, and having some treatment, may be the reason why you recover. Calling the doctor, and recovering, is 'co-fated'. So, to take action certainly can be effective ? you're calling the doctor resulting in your recovery. So we should not simply sit and watch. This is the most apt argument of life.

Though seeing this doesn't to any degree undermine the fatalist's position, for just as your recovering was fated (if only you had known it), so was your calling the doctor! This might be how it happened, all right, but if the event of your calling the doctor was caused by prior circumstances (as all events are, according to the theory of causal determinism) then in what sense could you be considered to exercise your free will?

I have read a wonderful example explaining this context; this is quoted by CHRYSIPPUS (Cicero, On fate 42?3 = Long and Sedley 1987, 62C 8?9; Aulus Gellius, Attic nights 7.2.11 = Long and Sedley 1987, 62D 4).if it is added here would surely help in easy understanding, so am adapting it here.

It goes with rolling of a cylinder; he says that there are two distinct types of cause working here. One is our pushing the cylinder to make it move; this is the 'auxiliary and proximate cause' ? we can call it the 'external cause'. And the other is the cylinder's being round; this is the 'complete and primary cause' ? which we can call the 'internal cause'. We may be inclined to object that the being round is not really a cause. It is a property that the cylinder has, as would be its redness and heaviness, just in case it is red and heavy. The color and weight of the cylinder have no bearing on its rolling ? a blue, light cylinder rolls just as well ? its roundness does have a bearing on its rolling: if it weren't round, it wouldn't roll. We would say that the roundness was a necessary condition for the cylinder's rolling, just as the pushing of the cylinder was also necessary: no push, no rolling. But together both the roundness and the pushing were sufficient for the rolling.

Chrysippus wants us to note that both the external cause and the internal cause themselves had causes properly located in the causal nexus comprising the entire history of the world. The external cause of the push was itself caused by our foot swinging to meet the cylinder, and the internal cause of the cylinder's roundness was caused by the manufacturing process that made it. And we may suppose that the rolling will itself cause something else to happen, such as the knocking over of a sheep, or a splash in the stream, or both. In short, nothing has happened which violates the theory of causal determinism. I think the above example would have certainly cleared everything, for this same concept I would like to quote my example. (Note: this is based on theism and for atheist I have a separate thing let me not put that here).before going into the example, by this time you would be clear that god has predetermined certain things and the rest remains in our hands, to be more clear I add the example here "the 'fate' is that you have to travel in a particular road, the lane you choose in that road is your 'free will', you may choose a smooth lane, or a thorny one. Depending on what you chose you will be given the results and that implies your good and bad deeds." now a question may be raised if not everything is free will, or fate, but a complex of both, then where is the boundary that separates the duo. For that the above example will stand for. Thus even though deity has given us power and will, we are limited with our powers, with that power circle we can act according to our free will and that decides all. So it is clear that whatever happens now, happened by, and going to happen in future is 'co-fated' and doesn't falls in either of the two poles.

In this area I have just given a brief introduction and description of what is what and why it is and why it is not. It is just a succinct picture depicted about different notions.

Bala Arjun

In The News:

This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news

Film School Rejects

Immersive Cinema: The Philosophy Behind VR
Film School Rejects
I've wanted virtual reality as far back as I can remember. It could have been that one Friday afternoon hanging out at Tilt, the local arcade at the Richland Mall in Waco, Texas where an early concept virtual reality system was being demoed. The rig ...


VGR.com

Cyberpunk 2077 Will Explore the Philosophy of the Genre
VGR.com
In a recent interview with PCGamer, writer Stanis Swiecicki spoke about the role that philosophy will play in the game. Representatives of CD Projekt Red have previously said that they won't shy away from political themes, as these are at the heart of ...

and more »

Review and commentary of “Finance and Philosophy: Why we are always surprised”
American Enterprise Institute
There is a greater cache of practical banking knowledge contained in Finance and Philosophy than will you find reading countless articles in academic banking journal articles, should you even have the background and the patience to take on such a task.


Comicbook.com

'Cyberpunk 2077' Will Balance Philosophy and Action
Comicbook.com
“But then there's the more philosophical side of the genre. Think Blade Runner or Ghost in the Shell. Our mission is to give players strong elements of both. You'll experience the thrills of using cybernetic implants and high-tech weaponry in combat ...

and more »

San Diego Reader

A difference in breakfast sandwich philosophy
San Diego Reader
#There's this undeveloped lot at the corner of Carlsbad Village Drive and State Street, the main crossroads of Carlsbad Village. Well, mostly undeveloped. For some time there's been a little juice bar doing business out of a converted storage container ...


Reminder Publications

Chicopee writer expresses personal philosophy in book
Reminder Publications
CHICOPEE – Sean Goonan describes himself as an “armchair philosopher” and his book “The Foundation for Exploration” has been receiving some attention from readers. The Chicopee native recently appeared at an Authors Fair at the Springfield Central ...


Interesting Engineering

Humanoid Robot Successfully Delivers Philosophy Lecture to Over 100 Students
Interesting Engineering
With the overall level of acceptance of AI-supported technology by the general public as well as local governments increasing in the past few years, developers and researchers have been able to explore new areas of application in the area of robotics ...


Carleton College News

Carleton philosophy lectures questions the limits of a parent's responsibilities for caring for their children
Carleton College News
Scripps College professor of philosophy Rivka Weinberg will present, “The Endless Umbilical Cord: Parental Obligations to Grown Children,” on Tuesday Oct. 23, from 7 to 8:30 p.m. in the Laurence McKinley Gould Library Athenaeum at Carleton College.


Quartz

Meet the philosopher behind “The Good Place”
Quartz
A philosopher is stuck in hell and can only survive if he breaks his moral code and pretends to be a demon. What does he do? This was the “emergency philosophical question” Todd May faced last summer. Though May, a professor at Clemson University, ...

and more »

Daily Mail

Meet the roboprofessor: Creepy life-like AI Bina48 teaches a philosophy course at West Point military academy
Daily Mail
The robot, Bina48, taught a philosophy course at West Point Military academy; The life-like bot taught two sessions of the course in front of about 100 students; William Barry, who has been using Bina48 to teach for several years, ultimately decided ...

Google News

Alumpeth Devi Temple of Kerala in India

Alumpeth temple is an ancient kalari temple of Sri Bhadrakali... Read More

Fire Walkers

DERVISH: - Whirling and ecstatically altering their conscious and soul... Read More

Common Psi-sense

Up until the start of the 20th Century there was... Read More

Satus Anxiety

'Every adult life could be said to be defined by... Read More

Infinity - Feynman

RICHARD FEYNMAN: - I had the great pleasure of watching... Read More

Nature of Visual Representation

Nature is often called "red in tooth and claw", this... Read More

In Answer To: Words Of Encouragement

Throughout my life, I have always known that it is... Read More

Stranded Notions: Time And Philosophy Of The Individual

As I look back now, a long time seems to... Read More

Teilhard de Chardin

FATHER PIERRE TEILHARD de CHARDIN:He is one of my heroes... Read More

The Animal and the Human

Recent DNA analyses have revealed that humans share a majority... Read More

Evolution and Exorcisms

EVOLUTION: More surprising to me as I consider where my... Read More

Joseph Brant and The Hegelian Dialectic

I admit I am only able to provide guesses as... Read More

Purpose

There is no God.Belief is a stray sentiment; it functions... Read More

Culture and Knowledge

In eastern Cultures the passing of thought was considered valuable,... Read More

Knowledge and Study of Social Science

. Human being Knowledge & social scienceHuman beings are the... Read More

Belief is Closure

The CON in CONstructs:There are many esoteric wisdom schools and... Read More

Life in the Universe; Part 1

Is there life ( extraterrestrial life or any other form... Read More

Why Im Glad Im Not a Minority Writer

I'll admit that I used to be jealous of my... Read More

The Knowledge Filter

"[I often get] the feeling that the very concept of... Read More

The Tree of Life and Allies

There are names in many languages and cultures or even... Read More

An Amazing, Hazy Look Into The Future

Sometimes we all sit and think. Sometimes we doodle with... Read More

Simple Words

The words, the thoughts, the processes go on and on.As... Read More

Humans Who Are Disrespected Seek Revenge

The easiest way to gain enemies is to disrespect people.... Read More

Crop Circles and Critical Mass

CROP CIRCLES:The Learning Channel (August 7, 2003) just had a... Read More

The Earth Energy Grid

EARTH ENERGY GRID: - Sedona, Arizona is not only my... Read More