Deprecated: mysql_connect(): The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /home/a26f9f83/public_html/articles/includes/config.php on line 159
Doorstops and Paperweights > NetSparsh - Viral Content you Love & Share

Doorstops and Paperweights

Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, has come up with what he believes is a brilliant idea. He thinks the FCC should have to the power to hold cable and satellite channels to the same decency standards as over-the-air broadcasters. Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), Stevens' counterpart in the House, agrees. Each plans to propose bills to that end in his respective house of the U.S. Congress. Many of their colleagues, eager to always be viewed as tough on indecency, are ready to sign on to their proposed legislation. Never mind the fact that the courts have struck down similar legislation in the past. Stevens, doesn't see this as a problem. If he got his wish, Congress would just pass it and then, according to Stevens, "take [the cable and satellite industry] on and let the courts decide."

At the core of Senator Stevens' rationale is the fact that cable and satellite have become almost as ubiquitous as broadcast TV. Over 80% of all U.S. homes now subscribe to cable or satellite TV. In those homes, Stevens and his cohorts would argue, viewers make little or no distinction between subscription channels and broadcast channels, which are right along side each other on the cable or satellite box. Therefore, he feels that they should all be held to the same standard of decency. On the surface, that sounds like a sensible argument. However, there are three major problems with his proposed legislation.

First, unlike broadcast television, people choose to bring cable and satellite TV channels into their homes. This choice is a private contract between the company and the subscriber, delivered over that company's equipment. No one is forced to subscribe to cable or satellite TV. In fact, subscribers pay an ever-increasing subscription price for such a privilege.

Most people, except those who live in mountainous and/or rural areas, can receive broadcast channels over the air with a strong antenna. Even those who live in areas where over-the-air channels cannot be accessed with an antenna can subscribe to a very basic package that includes only their local channels and basic cable channels like The Weather Channel, some home-shopping channels, and one or two religious channels. Decency would never be an issue with any of the aforementioned cable channels, so where is their argument?

The argument against regulating premium channels like HBO, which Stevens wants to include in his legislation, should be a no-brainer. These channels do not come with any basic package and are selected and paid for individually by their subscribers.

But what about the basic channels that come along as part of a "classic cable" and/or "extended tier" package? So far, cable and satellite companies have refused to offer them on an a-la-carte basis and the FCC has ruled in their favor on this matter. Therefore, people are paying for channels like MTV, for example, that many find objectionable. Shouldn't these channels have to abide by broadcast decency standards? No, because people choose to bring these packages of channels into their homes. Now, granted, many of them subscribe to these packages solely because they want access to channels like ESPN, CNN, and Fox News, which are generally not included with the most basic tiers. They couldn't care less about any of the other channels in the package.

In a perfect world, subscribers could select these channels individually without having to pay for a lot of channels they don't want. However, the world is not perfect and life is not fair. To soften the blow, cable and satellite operators have provided a way for parents to block their children's access to channels they deem inappropriate. Regulating indecency on these channels wouldn't accomplish anything that the parental lockouts couldn't.

Second, imposing decency on cable and satellite channels would cripple, or possibly kill, an entire industry. In addition, burgeoning IPTV technologies, which would likely be strapped with the same regulations, would be stymied. Think of the damage it would do to the economy. Thousands would be laid off or not hired.

Many people subscribe to cable or satellite TV because they want access to something that is more edgy and is free to go a little further than broadcast TV. That's the main reason that broadcasters are pushing so hard for decency standards to be extended to cable and satellite. Although they've been trying to compete by pushing the envelope with our own programming since the advent of cable and satellite, they know they are at a disadvantage with the good portion of the public that desire programming with more artistic freedom. If cable and satellite TV were suddenly held to the same decency standards as broadcasters, a huge number of their subscribers would pull the plug. Scores of cable and satellite set-top boxes would be reduced to doorstops and paperweights almost overnight.

Third, and probably most important, the regulating of cable and satellite TV would represent a slippery slope toward other, even more serious kinds of censorship. History has taught us that, without strong restraints, governments will stop at nothing to restrict the free speech and expression of their citizens. These restrictions are often based on rather whimsical criteria.

If government entities can get away with censoring material delivered as part of a private contract by means of privately owned equipment, then what's to stop them from censoring books, videos, newspapers, magazines, and even the internet? The First Amendment, you might say? Well, no, if the First Amendment could be interpreted in such as way as to allow the censorship of cable and satellite TV, our last line of defense would be broken down. Nothing could stop the government, as the flood gates would be opened to just about any kind of censorship they wanted.

Therefore, with the First Amendment having been breeched, we would have a constitutional crisis of monumental proportions. The one that people talked about in reference to Watergate would seem like child's play by comparison. Video stores, bookstores, and libraries could be busted for carrying indecent material, even if it couldn't legally be ruled obscene. Websites could be shut down by the thousands for being deemed a bit too risqué. If a government official didn't like something you wrote in a newspaper, magazine, or book, you could get slapped with a hefty fine or thrown in jail. Now you might think I'm exaggerating a little and that none of this stuff could ever happen in the United States, but would you be willing to take that chance?

Now, with all of that being said, I seriously doubt that this proposed regulation of the cable and satellite TV will become a reality any time soon. It would be better if the legislation would just pass and the courts would strike it down and thus reaffirm the First Amendment. However, that's not the way I think it will play out. I believe there won't be enough votes because of constitutional concerns on the part of the majority of legislators, so Stevens, Barton, and company will have to back off for now.

What I suspect, though, is that the decency hawks in Congress will try to use the mere talk of regulation to intimidate cable and satellite operators into practicing more "restraint", as Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona), a likely presidential candidate in 2008, calls it. However, that's a just a euphemism for "censor yourselves or we still might get back to trying to censor you later." Of course, cowering self-censorship is the most insidious form of censorship there is.

Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.

In The News:

This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at

Wall Street Journal

The Politics of Destruction
Wall Street Journal
Say this for Deborah Ramirez. The second woman to accuse Brett Kavanaugh of committing sexual assault more than 30 years ago may not clearly recall what happened, but her story does clarify the ugly politics at play. Democrats are using the #MeToo ...
On Politics: Kavanaugh Nomination in LimboNew York Times
Donald Trump says the Kavanaugh hearings are 'totally political.' He's right.CNN
Brett Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford: 'My fear will not hold me back from testifying'ABC News
Fox News -USA TODAY -Newsday -The New Yorker
all 16,542 news articles »

The Atlantic

The Atlantic Politics & Policy Daily: Acts of Rod
The Atlantic
The Atlantic Politics & Policy Daily: Acts of Rod. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein will meet with President Trump on Thursday following reports that he once suggested secretly recording the president and discussed invoking the Twenty-Fifth ...
Rosenstein to meet with Trump in wake of 'wire' report, amid firing speculationFox News
The Latest In Politics: Kavanaugh, RosensteinNPR
Rod Rosenstein's Job Is Safe, for Now: Inside His Dramatic DayNew York Times
New York Times -Axios
all 6,568 news articles »

New York Times

On Politics With Lisa Lerer: Congress Has a Bad Reputation. Kavanaugh Isn't Helping.
New York Times
With the political stakes so high, the risk of having Republicans question Dr. Blasey is obvious. Between a historically wide gender gap and a president not exactly known for his sensitivities when it comes to these issues, Republicans recognize that ...

Fox News

Thai junta leader interested in staying in politics
Fox News
For several months, Prayuth and his backers have been organizing support among pro-military parties, and at least three political groups have declared they will support Prayuth to become prime minister. Prayuth has also been making trips to provincial ...
Thai army chief eyes role in politics after electionChannel NewsAsia

all 161 news articles »

What happens when politics takes a starring role
Michael Moore's latest documentary, "Fahrenheit 11/9" opened over the weekend at about 1,700 theaters nationwide. The film, chronicling the rise of President Donald Trump, brought in $3.1 million at the box office, far below expectations. It was an ...

and more »

Sonics Rising (blog)

Goodbye Politics, It's Tod's Turn Now
Sonics Rising (blog)
With that vote the project will effectively shift from the political phase, wherein winning political approval has been their highest priority into a project construction phase where cost and schedule will dominate The Oak View Group's day to day workload.

and more »

What do you want to see in our Iowa Politics Insider newsletter? Tell us in this survey.
The Des Moines Register is relaunching its Iowa Politics Insider newsletter with a new format and more insights. We already have big plans for features and components that will come soon to the newsletter, but we want to hear more about what you want.


Politics In The Age Of Technology-Enabled Campaigning
Technology has fundamentally changed the practice of political campaigning. Gone are the days of whistle-stop tours and speeches by train. They have been replaced by targeted ads and social media platforms that influence with precision and by political ...


The Women's Wave: Backlash To Trump Persists, Reshaping Politics In 2018
Editor's note: NPR is examining the role of women in the 2018 midterm elections all week. To follow upcoming coverage and look back at how the role of women in the 2014 midterms was covered, click here.
For Most Trump Voters, 'Very Warm' Feelings for Him EnduredPew Research Center for the People and the Press
She Votes : NPRNPR
This is what we learned by counting the women's marchesWashington Post
CAWP - Rutgers University
all 114 news articles »

San Francisco Chronicle

Bay Area political events: SF Politics 101, candidate forums
San Francisco Chronicle
Upcoming political events in the Bay Area. MONDAY. S.F. Politics 101: An introduction to the city's politics. Speakers include state Sen. Scott Wiener, Joel Engardio, Jessica Ho and David Latt. Sponsored by United Democratic Club. Free. 6-8 p.m ...

Google News

Russian State Administration Gives New Facelift to Oil and Energy Resources

With the world's largest oil and natural gas reserves, second... Read More

Quick Thought on The Flow of Fuel and Costs

Without the flow of fuel our very mobile society comes... Read More

War with Red China Eminent Now

An irresponsible Chinese General made a very telling comment recently.... Read More

The Unborn and Cloning

The UnbornWith all this cloning in the news one can't... Read More

Liberalism ? A Mark Too Low A Price Too High

After the dance the piper must be paid. To help... Read More

Failure to Supervise at the Federal Trade Commission

Many MLM sales people mean well but they inadvertently commit... Read More

Minor Disruptions Cause Chaos in Transportation

Recently the Los Angeles Transit workers are on Strike and... Read More

Bodyguard Training in Mexico; My Experiences While Providing BG Training in Mexico

Mexico the country of Salsa, Tortillas and Corruption; I first... Read More

Is America Bankrupt?

The US Dollar has been falling continuously in last year.... Read More

Federal Trade Commission and Dismal Performance on Mergers

Most citizens agree that we need the Federal Trade Commission... Read More

Should Farmers Plant GM Terminator Seeds?

If a farmer plants the same crop three seasons in... Read More

OSHA is just more BS from the Blob of Bureaucracy

Is Ohio Manufacturing Sector really unable to compete in the... Read More

Timber Dumping

Recently in Professional Builder a cover article discussed how the... Read More

Is George Bush Two-Faced?

Yes, Bush is two-faced. The two sides of the faces... Read More

Maximizing Efficiency at Our Airports

Our Airports have excess capacity, which is not being used... Read More

The Halakah and Neo Cons

These leaders like the Rothschilds who backed Crowley's Hermetic Order... Read More

Steel Tubing Tariffs Prove that NAFTA Still Needs Work

The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January... Read More

William Seward and the Alaska Purchase

Aren't you glad you purchased Alaska? You got a bargain,... Read More

The Civil War - FOGC

Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to Lafayette in 1823 that... Read More

Public Procurement and Very Private Benefits

In every national budget, there is a part called "Public... Read More

Counter Intelligence: Accurate Words to Describe Our Dealings with Islamic Terrorists!

Introduction:Although politicians and so-called "Intelligence Experts" are the ones appearing... Read More

An Environmental Voting Guide for US State Elections

In these times when states are suffering extreme downward pressure... Read More

Bill OReilly: You Got This One Wrong!

I like Bill O'Reilly. I do. I have read two... Read More

A Cheap Holiday in Other Peoples Misery (catching up with Mordechai Vanunu in Israel)

One of my favourite pieces of music is the Sex... Read More

A Modern Lite in the Third World

Americans pride themselves on being the best, that's a fact.... Read More