Just War

In an age of terrorism, guerilla and total warfare the medieval doctrine of Just War needs to be re-defined. Moreover, issues of legitimacy, efficacy and morality should not be confused. Legitimacy is conferred by institutions. Not all morally justified wars are, therefore, automatically legitimate. Frequently the efficient execution of a battle plan involves immoral or even illegal acts.

As international law evolves beyond the ancient percepts of sovereignty, it should incorporate new thinking about pre-emptive strikes, human rights violations as casus belli and the role and standing of international organizations, insurgents and liberation movements.

Yet, inevitably, what constitutes "justice" depends heavily on the cultural and societal contexts, narratives, mores, and values of the disputants. Thus, one cannot answer the deceivingly simple question: "Is this war a just war?" - without first asking: "According to whom? In which context? By which criteria? Based on what values? In which period in history and where?"

Being members of Western Civilization, whether by choice or by default, our understanding of what constitutes a just war is crucially founded on our shifting perceptions of the West.

Imagine a village of 220 inhabitants. It has one heavily armed police constable flanked by two lightly equipped assistants. The hamlet is beset by a bunch of ruffians who molest their own families and, at times, violently lash out at their neighbors. These delinquents mock the authorities and ignore their decisions and decrees.

Yet, the village council - the source of legitimacy - refuses to authorize the constable to apprehend the villains and dispose of them, by force of arms if need be. The elders see no imminent or present danger to their charges and are afraid of potential escalation whose evil outcomes could far outweigh anything the felons can achieve.

Incensed by this laxity, the constable - backed only by some of the inhabitants - breaks into the home of one of the more egregious thugs and expels or kills him. He claims to have acted preemptively and in self-defense, as the criminal, long in defiance of the law, was planning to attack its representatives.

Was the constable right in acting the way he did?

On the one hand, he may have saved lives and prevented a conflagration whose consequences no one could predict. On the other hand, by ignoring the edicts of the village council and the expressed will of many of the denizens, he has placed himself above the law, as its absolute interpreter and enforcer.

What is the greater danger? Turning a blind eye to the exploits of outlaws and outcasts, thus rendering them ever more daring and insolent - or acting unilaterally to counter such pariahs, thus undermining the communal legal foundation and, possibly, leading to a chaotic situation of "might is right"? In other words, when ethics and expedience conflict with legality - which should prevail?

Enter the medieval doctrine of "Just War" (justum bellum, or, more precisely jus ad bellum), propounded by Saint Augustine of Hippo (fifth century AD), Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) in his "Summa Theologicae", Francisco de Vitoria (1548-1617), Francisco Suarez (1548-1617), Hugo Grotius (1583-1645) in his influential tome "Jure Belli ac Pacis" ("On Rights of War and Peace", 1625), Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1704), Christian Wolff (1679-1754), and Emerich de Vattel (1714-1767).

Modern thinkers include Michael Walzer in "Just and Unjust Wars" (1977), Barrie Paskins and Michael Dockrill in "The Ethics of War" (1979), Richard Norman in "Ethics, Killing, and War" (1995), Thomas Nagel in "War and Massacre", and Elizabeth Anscombe in "War and Murder".

According to the Catholic Church's rendition of this theory, set forth by Bishop Wilton D. Gregory of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops in his Letter to President Bush on Iraq, dated September 13, 2002, going to war is justified if these conditions are met:

"The damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations [is] lasting, grave, and certain; all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective; there must be serious prospects of success; the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated."

A just war is, therefore, a last resort, all other peaceful conflict resolution options having been exhausted.

The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy sums up the doctrine thus:

"The principles of the justice of war are commonly held to be:

Having just cause (especially and, according to the United Nations Charter, exclusively, self-defense);

Being (formally) declared by a proper authority;

Possessing a right intention;

Having a reasonable chance of success;

The end being proportional to the means used."

Yet, the evolution of warfare - the invention of nuclear weapons, the propagation of total war, the ubiquity of guerrilla and national liberation movements, the emergence of global, border-hopping terrorist organizations, of totalitarian regimes, and rogue or failed states - requires these principles to be modified by adding these tenets:

That the declaring authority is a lawfully and democratically elected government.

That the declaration of war reflects the popular will.

(Extension of 3) The right intention is to act in just cause.

(Extension of 4) ... or a reasonable chance of avoiding an annihilating defeat.

(Extension of 5) That the outcomes of war are preferable to the outcomes of the preservation of peace.

Still, the doctrine of just war, conceived in Europe in eras past, is fraying at the edges. Rights and corresponding duties are ill-defined or mismatched. What is legal is not always moral and what is legitimate is not invariably legal. Political realism and quasi-religious idealism sit uncomfortably within the same conceptual framework. Norms are vague and debatable while customary law is only partially subsumed in the tradition (i.e., in treaties, conventions and other instruments, as well in the actual conduct of states).

The most contentious issue is, of course, what constitutes "just cause". Self-defense, in its narrowest sense (reaction to direct and overwhelming armed aggression), is a justified casus belli. But what about the use of force to (deontologically, consequentially, or ethically):

Prevent or ameliorate a slow-motion or permanent humanitarian crisis;

Preempt a clear and present danger of aggression ("anticipatory or preemptive self-defense" against what Grotius called "immediate danger");

Secure a safe environment for urgent and indispensable humanitarian relief operations;

Restore democracy in the attacked state ("regime change");

Restore public order in the attacked state;

Prevent human rights violations or crimes against humanity or violations of international law by the attacked state;

Keep the peace ("peacekeeping operations") and enforce compliance with international or bilateral treaties between the aggressor and the attacked state or the attacked state and a third party;

Suppress armed infiltration, indirect aggression, or civil strife aided and abetted by the attacked state;

Honor one's obligations to frameworks and treaties of collective self-defense;

Protect one's citizens or the citizens of a third party inside the attacked state;

Protect one's property or assets owned by a third party inside the attacked state;

Respond to an invitation by the authorities of the attacked state - and with their expressed consent - to militarily intervene within the territory of the attacked state;

React to offenses against the nation's honor or its economy.

Unless these issues are resolved and codified, the entire edifice of international law - and, more specifically, the law of war - is in danger of crumbling. The contemporary multilateral regime proved inadequate and unable to effectively tackle genocide (Rwanda, Bosnia), terror (in Africa, Central Asia, and the Middle East), weapons of mass destruction (Iraq, India, Israel, Pakistan, North Korea), and tyranny (in dozens of members of the United Nations).

This feebleness inevitably led to the resurgence of "might is right" unilateralism, as practiced, for instance, by the United States in places as diverse as Grenada and Iraq. This pernicious and ominous phenomenon is coupled with contempt towards and suspicion of international organizations, treaties, institutions, undertakings, and the prevailing consensual order.

In a unipolar world, reliant on a single superpower for its security, the abrogation of the rules of the game could lead to chaotic and lethal anarchy with a multitude of "rebellions" against the emergent American Empire. International law - the formalism of "natural law" - is only one of many competing universalist and missionary value systems. Militant Islam is another. The West must adopt the former to counter the latter.

About The Author

Sam Vaknin is the author of Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain - How the West Lost the East. He is a columnist for Central Europe Review, PopMatters, and eBookWeb , a United Press International (UPI) Senior Business Correspondent, and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory Bellaonline, and Suite101 .

Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government of Macedonia.

Visit Sam's Web site at http://samvak.tripod.com

[email protected]

In The News:

This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news

CNN

GOP senator on Trump, state of politics: 'We may have hit bottom'
CNN
Washington (CNN) GOP Sen. Jeff Flake gave some of his harshest criticism of President Donald Trump to date in a commencement speech Wednesday to Harvard Law students, where he shared his concerns for the integrity of politics in the United States.

and more »

CNN

North Korea warns of nuclear showdown, calls Pence 'political dummy'
CNN
Choe called Pence a "political dummy" for comparing Libya to North Korea. She noted that Libya's nuclear program was in its early stages when it came to the negotiating table, while North Korea has spent years developing its nuclear weapons. "As a ...
The Trump/Kim Jong-un coin is terrible design–and worse politicsCo.Design (blog)
North Korean envoy: VP Pence 'a political dummy;' says US can meet at table or 'nuclear showdown'MassLive.com

all 1,889 news articles »

Commentary Magazine

Politics, Not Paranoia
Commentary Magazine
It's understandable that cynicism has become the default approach for average Americans navigating the political environment. Interpreting events as the product of a raw power contest rather than a clash between competing principles is not only simpler ...

and more »

The Atlantic

The Atlantic Politics & Policy Daily: Thou Shalt Not Block
The Atlantic
-Written by Lena Felton (@lenakfelton) and Taylor Hosking (@Taylor__Hosking). Today in 5 Lines. A federal judge ruled that it's unconstitutional for President Trump to block people from his Twitter account. After more than a year-long delay, Trump's ...


Pacific Standard

The Triumph of Trump's Law and Order Politics
Pacific Standard
After all, Trump has staked his political messaging on his role as a "law and order" president, and the uptick in ambush killings of police officers in the post-Ferguson years certainly helped make extra protections for police a pillar of his campaign ...

and more »

The Cut

Stacey Abrams's Win Is Just the Beginning
The Cut
And turn out they did. With 76.5 percent of the vote, Abrams's sweeping victory in Georgia's democratic gubernatorial primary provides an opportunity for all of us to learn new lessons about what's possible in politics today — and gives us all some ...
Stacey Abrams's Georgia primary victory is the latest win for black political organizingVox
Plot twist: Stacey Abrams, trailblazing Georgia politician … and romance novelist?NBCNews.com
Stacey Abrams Wins Georgia Democratic Primary for Governor, Making HistoryNew York Times
CBS News -Essence -CNN
all 699 news articles »

Los Angeles Times

Essential Politics: In California's primary for governor, it's a race for second place
Los Angeles Times
The poll shows Californians are strongly supportive of the Affordable Care Act and unfriendly to Republican politicians who voted to repeal it, while they're largely opposed to the new tax law and less likely to reelect their member of Congress if he ...

and more »

Pacific Standard

Single Mothers Are Having Their Moment in American Politics
Pacific Standard
Since the last presidential election, there's been a surge of women, single mothers included, driven to run at local, state, and federal levels, according to EMILY's List, a political action committee that advocates to elect pro-choice Democratic ...


Cokie Roberts On The History Of Women In Politics
NPR
And we put them to Cokie Roberts, who joins us to take your questions about politics and other government work. Hey there, Cokie. COKIE ROBERTS, BYLINE: Hi, Steve. INSKEEP: First question here about the so-called year of the woman. SCOTT ARIAS: ...


New York Times

Whites' Unease Shadows the Politics of a More Diverse America ...
New York Times
As the country heads for a time when no group makes up a majority, the change may affect white attitudes in far more than racial and economic matters.

and more »
Google News

Dont Trade Rights for Security

"Those who sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety are not... Read More

Great Melting Pot Indeed

An interesting conversation that I thought I must share with... Read More

How Many Cases Will Elliot Spitzer Lose Now?

The devastating loss in case of Elliot Spitzer for NY... Read More

Timber Dumping

Recently in Professional Builder a cover article discussed how the... Read More

Pierre Dupont de Nemours

After arranging the Armistice that ended or settled outstanding issues... Read More

Fair Trade and Pearls in the U.S.

Guides for RetailersThe regulations about marketing pearls are listed in... Read More

The Delicate Art of Balancing The Budget

Government budgets represent between 25% and 50% of he Gross... Read More

Fuel Prices and Trucking; A Reality Check On What Drives America

It appears we are having a terrible situation with the... Read More

Fight Terror, With Education

A War on Terrorism? Conventional war being brought on an... Read More

Bureaucracy Suffocating the Flow of Transportation

We are slowing the transportation flows of our civilization by... Read More

We Are Turning a Corner in Foreign Relations, Thanks GW Bush!

Kudos goes out to the George Walker Bush's Administration and... Read More

Fuel Prices on the Rise

With gasoline prices at the pump climbing strongly into the... Read More

6 Steps to Destroy the American Infidels

The United States has enemies, which call the country the... Read More

The US Government; Under Sarbaines Oxley

Sarbaines Oxley was probably the easiest way to destroy free... Read More

How Futuristic Is Anarchy As A Way To Organize The State (II)

Any chances for a country to be ruled by alternative... Read More

Housing Bubble, Interest Rates, Timber Costs; What Has Changed?

What has really changed in the housing market with regards... Read More

Dismal Performance of the NSA

The NSA failed the American people and allowed the attack... Read More

MORAL ARMOR Condemns Home and Business Seizure Law

Nothing could be more alarming for Americans than what I... Read More

5 Years in Prison for Satirical Flash Films About the President of Belarus

They do not allow the criticism of the president in... Read More

Garbage in Garbage out; California Blackouts

Why did the California energy crisis happen? Who is to... Read More

Gone With the Wind Almost Did Not Make It

Corporate America has been shaken recently by lawsuits and criminal... Read More

Mental Masturbation of FTC Franchise Rule Report

Please read through this quick thought and discussion as if... Read More

How Can You Have True Freedom if They Control Every Aspect of Your Life?

Freedom is in the eyes of the beholder. In Communist... Read More

TSA Missteps at Our Airports

The TSA seems to have completely missed the ball at... Read More

We Must Register AIDS Carriers and Homosexual Men

It is a law that we register deadly weapons with... Read More