The Value of Stocks of a Company

The debate rages all over Eastern and Central Europe, in countries in transition as well as in Western Europe. It raged in Britain during the 80s: Is privatization really the robbery in disguise of state assets by a select few, cronies of the political regime? Margaret Thatcher was accuse of it - and so was the Agency of Transformation in the Republic of Macedonia. At what price should the companies owned by the State have been sold? This question is not as simple and straight forward as it sounds.

There is a gigantic stock pricing mechanism known as the Stock Exchange. Willing buyers and willing sellers meet there to freely negotiate deals of stock purchases and sale. Every day new information, macro-economic and micro-economic, determines the value of companies.

Greenspan testifies, the economic figures are too good to be true and the rumour mill starts working: interest rates might go up. The stock market reacts with a frenzy - it crashes. Why?

A top executive is asked how profitable will his firm be this quarter. He winks, he grins - this is interpreted by Wall Street to mean that they WILL go up. The share goes up frantically: no one wants to sell it, everyone want to buy it. The result: a sharp rise in the price. Why?

Moreover: the price of the stock prices of companies A with an identical size, similar financial ratios (and in the same industry) barely budges. Why didn't it display the same behaviour?

We say that the stocks of the two companies have different elasticity (their prices move up and down differently), probably the result of different sensitivities to changes in interest rates and in earnings estimates. But this is just to rename the problem. The question remains: why? Why do the shares of similar companies react differently?

Economy is a branch of psychology and wherever and whenever humans are involved, answers don't come easy. A few models have been developed and are in wide use but it is difficult to say that any of them has real predictive or even explanatory value. Some of these models are "technical" in nature: they ignore the fundamentals of the company. Such models assume that all the relevant information is already incorporated in the price of the stock and that changes in expectations, hopes, fears and attitudes will be reflected in the prices immediately. Others are fundamental: these models rely on the company's performance and assets. The former models are applicable mostly to companies whose shares are traded publicly, in stock exchanges. They are not very useful in trying to attach a value to the stock of a private firm. The latter type (fundamental) models can be applied more broadly.

The value of a stock (a bond, a firm, real estate, or any asset) is the sum of the income (cash flow) that a reasonable investor would expect to get in the future, discounted at the appropriate discount (usually, interest) rates. The discounting reflects the fact that money received in the future has lower (discounted) purchasing power than money received now. Moreover, we can invest money received now and get interest on it (which should normally equal the discount). Put differently: the discount reflects the loss in purchasing power of money not received at present or the interest that we lose by not being able to invest the money currently (because we will receive it only in the future). This is the time value of money. Another problem is the uncertainty of future payments, or the risk that we will not receive them. The longer the period, the higher the risk, of course. A model exists which links the time, the value of the stock, the cash flows expected in the future and the discount (interest) rates.

We said that the rate that we use to discount future cash flows is the prevailing interest rate and this is partly true in stable, predictable and certain economies. But the discount rate depends on the inflation rate in the country where the firm is (or in all the countries where it operates in case it is a multinational), on the projected supply of the shares and demand for it and on the aforementioned risk of non-payment. In certain places, additional factors must be taken into consideration (for example: country risk or foreign exchange risks).

The supply of a stock and, to a lesser extent, the demand for it determine its distribution (how many shareowners are there) and, as a result, its liquidity. Liquidity means how freely can one buy and sell it and at which quantities sought or sold do prices become rigid. Example: if a lot of shares is sold that gives the buyer the control of a company - the buyer will normally pay a "control premium". Another example: in thin markets it is easier to manipulate the price of a stock by artificially increasing the demand or decreasing the supply ("cornering" the market).

In a liquid market (no problems to buy and to sell), the discount rate is made up of two elements: one is the risk-free rate (normally, the interest payable on government bonds), the other being the risk related rate (the rate which reflects the risk related to the specific stock).

But: what is this risk rate?

The most widely used model to evaluate specific risks is the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM).

According to it, the discount rate is the risk-free rate plus a coefficient (called beta) multiplied by a risk premium general to all stocks (in the USA it was calculated to be 5.5%). Beta is a measure of the volatility of the return of the stock relative to that of the return of the market. A stock's Beta can be obtained by calculating the coefficient of the regression line between the weekly returns of the stock and those of the stock market during a selected period of time.

Unfortunately, different betas can be calculated by selecting different parameters (for instance, the length of the period on which the calculation is performed). Another problem is that betas change with every new datum. Professionals resort to sensitivity tests which neutralize the changes that betas undergo with time.

Still, with all its shortcomings and disputed assumptions, the CAPM should be used to determine the discount rate. But to use the discount rate we must have what to discount, future cash flows.

The only relatively certain cash flows are the dividends paid to the shareholders. So, Dividend Discount Models (DDM) were developed.

Other models relate to the projected growth of the company (which is supposed to increase the payable dividends and to cause the stock to appreciate in value).

Still, DDM require, as input, the ultimate value of the stock and growth models are only suitable for mature firms with a stable and not too high dividend growth. Two-stage models are more powerful because they combine both emphases: on dividends and on growth. This is because of the life-cycle of firms: at first, they tend to have a high and unstable dividend growth rate (the DDM tackles this adequately). As the firm matures, it is expected to have a lower and stable growth rate, suitable for the treatment of Growth Models.

But how many years of future income (from dividends) should we use in a our calculations? If a firm is profitable now, is there any guarantee that it will continue to be so in the next year, the next decade? If it does continue to be profitable - who can guarantee that its dividend policy will not change and that the same rate of dividends will continue to be distributed?

The number of periods (normally, years) selected for the calculation is called the "price to earnings (P/E) multiple". The multiple denotes by how much we multiply the (after tax) earnings of the firm to obtain its value. It depends on the industry (growth or dying), the country (stable or geopolitically perilous), on the ownership structure (family or public), on the management in place (committed or mobile), on the product (new or old technology) and a myriad of other factors. It is almost impossible to objectively quantify or formulate this process of analysis and decision making. In telecommunications, the range of numbers used for valuing stocks oa private firm is between 7 and 10, for instance. If the company is in the public domain, the number can shoot up to 20 times the net earnings.

While some companies pay dividends (some even borrow to do so), others just do not pay. So in stock valuation, dividends are not the only future incomes you expect to get. Capital gains (profits which are the result of the appreciation in the value of the stock) also count. This is the result of expectations regarding the firm's free cash flow, in particular the free cash flow that goes to the shareholders.

There is no agreement as to what constitutes free cash flow. In general, it is the cash which a firm has after sufficiently investing in its development, research and (predetermined) growth. Cash Flow Statements have become a standard accounting requirement in the 80s (starting with the USA). Because "free" cash flow can be easily extracted from these reports, stock valuation based on free cash flow became increasingly popular and feasible. It is considered independent of the idiosyncratic parameters of different international environments and therefore applicable to multinationals or to national firms which export.

The free cash flow of a firm that is debt-financed solely by its shareholders belongs solely to them. Free cash flow to equity (FCFE) is:

FCFE = Operating Cash Flow MINUS Cash needed for meeting growth targets

Where

Operating Cash Flow = Net Income (NI) PLUS Depreciation and Amortization

Cash needed for meeting growth targets = Capital Expenditures + Change in Working Capital

Working Capital = Total Current Assets - Total Current Liabilities

Change in Working Capital = One Year's Working Capital MINUS Previous Year's Working Capital

The complete formula is:

FCFE = Net Income PLUS

Depreciation and Amortization MINUS

Capital Expenditures PLUS

Change in Working Capital.

A leveraged firm that borrowed money from other sources (could also be preferred stockholders) has a different free cash flow to equity. Its CFCE must be adjusted to reflect the preferred dividends and principal repayments of debt (MINUS sign) and the proceeds from new debt and preferred stocks (PLUS sign). If its borrowings are sufficient to pay the dividends to the holders of preference shares and to service its debt - its debt to capital ratio is sound.

The FCFE of a leveraged firm is:

FCFE = Net Income PLUS

Depreciation and Amortization MINUS

Principal Repayment of Debt MINUS

Preferred Dividends PLUS

Proceeds from New Debt and Preferred MINUS

Capital Expenditures MINUS

Changes in Working Capital.

A sound debt ratio means:

FCFE = Net Income MINUS

(1 - Debt Ratio)*(Capital Expenditures MINUS

Depreciation and Amortization PLUS

Change in Working Capital).

About The Author

Sam Vaknin is the author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited" and "After the Rain - How the West Lost the East". He is a columnist in "Central Europe Review", United Press International (UPI) and ebookweb.org and the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory, Suite101 and searcheurope.com. Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government of Macedonia.

His web site: http://samvak.tripod.com

In The News:

This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news

Investopedia (blog)

Four Strategies For Managing A Portfolio Of Mutual Funds
Investopedia (blog)
This is the most commonly seen mutual-fund strategy. How does it work? Basically, if your portfolio does not boast a plan or structure, then it is likely that you are employing a wing-it strategy. If you are adding money to your portfolio today, how do ...


Pensions & Investments

Here's why small-cap stocks could be vulnerable to ETF outflows
MarketWatch
Exchange-traded funds are among the most popular ways for investors to get exposure to nearly any asset class, region, or strategy in global financial markets. However, rather than providing safety in numbers, this could become a risk factor for some ...
Sustainalytics finds a quarter of ETFs, 15% of mutual funds have ...Pensions & Investments

all 4 news articles »

New York Times

Three Funds Find Routes to Top Performance in a Rough Market
New York Times
500 sputtered to a 1.2 percent loss and many sectors sagged, the managers of three of the top-performing mutual funds scooted ahead by betting on growth stocks and Latin America. Christopher J. Bonavico, of the Jackson Square SMID-Cap Growth Fund, said ...


Nasdaq

3 Mutual Funds to Make Good as the Tax Season Wraps Up
Nasdaq
Tax Day should have been Apr 17 this year. But, the IRS has given tax payers an additional day to file and pay returns after the webpage for paying tax bills using their bank account crashed. Tax Day has always been special for the stock market ...
3 Mutual Funds to Make Good as the Tax Season Wraps Up - April ...Zacks.com

all 1 news articles »

Investorplace.com

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Seems Like High-Risk Mutual Fund
Investorplace.com
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (NYSE:BABA) stock has paused in recent months. A rise in geopolitical risk and a selloff in tech have lead investors to close positions in Alibaba stock. A low multiple and the company's high growth could attract many buyers ...
BABA Stock Quote and Analysis of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd - InvestorPlaceInvestorPlace
Alibaba Group Holding Limited - BABA - Stock Price Today - ZacksZacks
Free Report for BABA - Zacks.comZacks

all 152 news articles »

CNBC

Indians are starting to ditch gold and property investments for stocks and mutual funds, survey shows
CNBC
Indians hold a relatively low percentage of their total wealth in financial assets but that trend might be changing, according to a recent Credit Suisse survey. The investment bank has released its latest version of a Emerging Consumer Survey that ...

and more »

Investor's Business Daily

Trade-War Olive Branch Fuels Rise By Stocks In 'Best Mutual Funds'
Investor's Business Daily
Many individual investors and top stock mutual funds benefited. Take AB Large Cap Growth Fund (APGAX), a 2018 IBD Best Mutual Funds Award winner. The fund tacked on 0.35% on Monday as the S&P 500 gained 0.36%. All but one of the fund's 47 stocks were ...


US 'junk' bond funds take in most weekly cash since 2016: Lipper
Reuters
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Investors stormed back into the market for the riskiest corporate debt during the latest week, Lipper data showed on Thursday, pumping the most cash into U.S.-based, high-yield bond funds in over 16 months. The resurgence in demand ...

and more »

TheStreet.com

Mutual Fund Managers Love These Stocks and You Should Too
TheStreet.com
As the stock market continues in its ninth year of an impressive bull run, mutual funds have enjoyed stellar gains. In 2017, U.S. diversified stock mutual funds averaged a gain of 18.26%, just off the heels of the S&P 500's 22% gain last year. While ...
This unique mutual fund charges less than an index fund if it underperformsMarketWatch
Is Putnam Small Cap Growth A (PNSAX) a Strong Mutual Fund Pick Right Now?Nasdaq
Is Laudus US Large Cap Growth (LGILX) a Strong Mutual Fund Pick Right Now?Zacks.com

all 17 news articles »

Investor's Business Daily

Best Mutual Fund Managers See Silver Lining In Weak Q1 Stock Performance
Investor's Business Daily
31. Only 10.4% of eligible U.S. diversified stock funds made the Best Mutual Funds Awards list. "A drop in valuations is good," he added. Meanwhile, how weak was stock market performance? March's 2.54% setback marked the S&P 500's second straight ...
MFs weekly wrap: Net inflows into equity mutual funds fell 59% MoM in MarchMoneycontrol.com

all 4 news articles »
Google News

A Personal Stock Market Investment Philosophy

∙ Make every investment in the stock market a long-term... Read More

Hedge Funds: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Alfred Winslow Jones started hedge funds in 1949. He was... Read More

Hot Stock Trader: How to Pick Momentum Stocks with Ease and Simplicity

Most stock traders know that momentum trading can be a... Read More

Analyzing Growth Stocks: An Important Focus For Any Investor

Analyzing growth stocks is an important focus for any investor.... Read More

Market Timing

Every broker and financial planner will tell you that you... Read More

Which Way The Market

I am hearing predictions by brokers, financial planners, talk show... Read More

A Good Fund Manager

Every Wall Street analyst, financial planner and broker will tell... Read More

What Our Investment Advisor Wont Say Off The Bat

Most advisors will tell you they can beat the market.... Read More

You Wont Like This

Why? Because I am going to shatter your conventional wisdom... Read More

Hold Em and Fold Em

When most analysts, financial planners, fund specialists and investors try... Read More

Stock Loans

Hedge current portfolio positions and gain access to capital resources... Read More

DIY Portfolio Management

Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are growing. Investors are choosing low... Read More

Pathways

During our travel down life's path we come to many... Read More

Stock Investment Advice

Stock investment advice is easy to find. Do you get... Read More

What is the Most Important Indicator of All?

Most stock market traders have a favorite technical indicator.The one... Read More

Zero Sum Game

Most people think the stock market is a zero sum... Read More

Frog In The Pot

You remember the story about the frog that was put... Read More

Some Good News for A Change

Before we get into all the good news out there,... Read More

Bottoms Ups

If you have talked to a stock broker or financial... Read More

Parachute Investing

Ever jumped out of an airplane? It's OK if you... Read More

Market Globalization

Just 30 years ago the stock market was a shadow... Read More

Size Counts!

What the heck am I talking about?It is often said... Read More

Why Investors Use Financial Planners

Do you have a financial planner? Does one of your... Read More

The Skinny on Mutual Fund Investing

Mutual fund investing is a lot like Thai cooking. Everyone... Read More

Price to Earnings Ratio - P/E

After finding the price of a particular stock, usually the... Read More