Six Urban Myths About Taxation

Six Urban Myths ? Taxation

"I am proud to be paying taxes? I could be just as proud for half the money." ? Arthur Godfrey

Temporary Taxation in Canada

In 1917, the Income War Tax Act (7-8 George V, Chap. 28) introduced Canadians to a 'temporary' tax on corporate and personal income.

After 88 years it's safe to say that the first myth of taxation is that Parliament considers taxation to be 'temporary.'

Taxation Isn't Constitutional

You've heard that it is against Canada's Constitution for the federal government to collect income taxes.

The British Parliament in the British North America Act, 1867 §91(3) specifically empowered the federal government of Canada with the authority for "the raising of money by any mode or system of taxation".

The highest court in Canada has held that this power to raise money through taxes is "apparently limitless" (Re Anti-Inflation Act [1976] 2 S.C.R. 373 at 390 (S.C.C.), per LASKIN, C.J.)

American readers who've heard the same thing (i.e., Congress cannot legally collect taxes) should read the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which when ratified in 1913, empowered the U.S. Government to impose income taxes directly on its citizens.

So the second myth of taxation is that the federal government doesn't legally have the authority to collect taxes.

I Can't Be Convicted Of Evasion If I Believe?

Perhaps, you've heard that in order to be convicted of evasion you have to have a 'guilty mind' and if you believe, you really believe, that collecting taxes is illegal you cannot be convicted of evasion.

§239(1)(d) Income Tax Act ("ITA") provides that every person who wilfully evades or attempt to evade taxes imposed by the ITA is guilty of an offence.

The offence of evasion is a true criminal offence: R. v. Klundert (2004), 242 D.L.R. (4th) 644 (Ont. C.A.) per DOHERTY, J.A. at §32; and R. v. Knox Contracting Ltd., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 338 (S.C.C.) at pp. 346-348.

There are two constituent elements of a crime: the prohibited conduct (actus reus) and the requisite fault (mens rea).

Parliament's use of the word "wilfully" in §239(1)(d) ITA implies by something done by conscious design or on purpose; but does that really mean what it sounds like?

No; mistakes of law generally aren't a defence (e.g., §19 Criminal Code), but certain factual mistakes (e.g., errors of addition) could be ? it depends on the circumstances.

"A person's mistaken belief that a statute is invalid or is otherwise not applicable to that person's conduct is a mistake of law. It is, however, a mistake of law that is irrelevant to the existence of the fault requirement in s. 239(1)(d).": Klundert at §59; Criminal Code s. 19; R. v. Ricci (2004), 190 O.A.C. 375 (Ont. C.A.)

The third myth of taxation is that you cannot be convicted of evasion if you believe you don't have to pay taxes.

What Canada Revenue Tells Me Is Binding On Them

A taxpayer calls a Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA") hotline or goes to a local tax service office and gets their question answered, or receive other guidance on how to 'properly' do what that taxpayer is obliged to do under the ITA.

What if the advice is wrong? Most Canadians think that they can rely on it, but can they?

The short answer is that they can't - that the fourth myth.

Why this is true is somewhat complex: Since 1931 Canada's Parliament has been sovereign and they could pass any law they wanted (Burma Oil Company v. Lord Advocate [1965] AC 75 (H.L.)), but with the Canada Act, 1982 (U.K.) Parliament became subject to The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which imposed legal limits on Parliament's ability to infringe certain fundamental rights.

The ITA is a complete code (i.e., covering all aspects of its subject matter) and it is the job of taxpayers to follow it, CRA to enforce it, the courts to interpret it and then back to Parliament if amendment is needed.

These various interests are perpetually in conflict: taxpayers want to pay as little tax as legally permissible (Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Westminster (Duke of), [1936] A.C. 1 (H.L.)) but Parliament wants to collect as much money as it possibly can.

Subject to a Charter prohibited infringement of a fundamental right, Parliament's complete code in the ITA is paramount. In other words, no one at CRA can change one word in the ITA and if any advice they give is contrary to the Act, that advice is ineffective and the ITA provision will prevail. Thus, CRA's advice is only binding on them ? and you ? if it's correct. It all goes back to the ITA and Parliamentary supremacy.

CRA's Can't Find My Offshore Funds

Perhaps you set up an asset-protection trust somewhere and you've been collecting income offshore for years; or, possibly you want to sell your condo in Barbados and plan to keep the proceeds in Belize.

§2(1) ITA imposes taxes on residents of Canada, not only on their Canadian source income but on their worldwide income. The limits on this general rule are few, narrow and require specialized expert advice to interpret (e.g., in-coming immigrants and Tax Treaties).

Just so we're clear, what we are talking about here is the crime of tax evasion.

In the post 9/11 world, secrecy doesn't exist like it did.

Domestically in the U.S. the Bank Secrecy Act (1970; "BSA") was expanded and clarified after 9/11 with passage of the USA Patriot Act (2001; HR 3162 RDS). Congress decided that an effective way to catch terrorists was to monitor cash transaction and require reporting from "money services businesses". Since the threshold for transactions in now in aggregate US$1,000 per day, it's a very tight filter.

Canada established The Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) to collect, analyze and, when appropriate, disclose financial intelligence on suspected money laundering, cash transactions and terrorist financing activities.

Internationally the U.S. used its political and diplomatic clout to step up foreign disclosure of suspicious transactions.

Canada and the U.S. belong to various international organizations that share financial and other information. One of the most dreaded of these among tax havens is The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ("OECD"), which has obtained commitments from 33 of the world's 35 listed tax havens to comply with the OECD's principles of transparency and effective exchange of information.

By compelling tax havens to disclose banking information OECD members obtain fiscal information for the one purpose (combating money laundering and tracing terrorist's funds), which they can then use for another purpose (fighting fraud and other tax crimes).

It is myth number five that you can access or use offshore money and not have be discovered; it can happen in any of a thousand different ways, the majority of which his entirely beyond your control.

If a taxpayer finds themself in this position and wants to take advantage of an amnesty provision, then must retain the services of a tax lawyer. Because communications with an accountants aren't usually privileged (in Canada - Baron et al. v. The Queenm [1990] 1 C.T.C. 125 (F.C.A.); or in the U.S. - U.S. v. Arthur Young et al., (1984) 465 U.S. 805 (S.C.)) only a lawyer can achieve this without disclosing their client's before the terms are agreed to, and reduced to writing.

CRA Is There To Help

CRA says it wants you to be, "treated fairly and have the information, advice?[you] need to meet [your] obligations:" http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/agency/fairness/rights-e.html.

Except CRA doesn't, and can't, hold itself accountable for any "information [or] advice" it gives. If they make a mistake, and you rely on their wrong 'advice', it will be you who will pay.

CRA has an opinion on everything to do with taxes; but having an opinion is no guarantee that the opinion is correct. To do what CRA says is the safe decision, but it may not always be the right decision: Canada v. Imperial Oil Ltd., [2004] 2 C.T.C. 190 (Fed. C.A.).

Caveat: Employees have little, or no, scope to tax plan. The wealthy and businesses do potentially have such flexibility, but deciding whether to take advantage of their opportunities is a question that requires an in-depth analysis of their particular circumstances by expert accountants and lawyers.
A creative tax plan may be challenged, but a creative and highly successful plan (i.e., one that defers or eliminates a lot of taxes) will be challenged. A safe rule of thumb is 'if you can't afford ? or don't want ? to fight about it, don't do it.'

This is not to say that all potential problems with CRA are self-created ? they aren't.

In R. v. Roberts & Viccars, [1998] B.C.J. No. 3184 (Prov. Ct.) the court stayed charges under §24(1) of the Charter, against the accused charged with tax evasion and fraud. The court found that, "the abuses in his case are varied and blatant and span the investigation ? what [the CRA officer] did, aided and abetted by his supervisor?" showed "distain for the Charter."

In R. v. Saplys [1999] O.J. No. 393 (Ont. Gen. Div.) granted a stay when the investigation proved to be so unfair as to contravene fundamental notions of justice that it undermined the integrity of the justice system and compromised the defendant's right to a fair trial.

"These cases [and others] indicate that the abuses in Roberts & Viccars are not limited to a particular office. It remains to be seen whether there will be widespread changes in the conduct of SI investigations": Thomas Boddez, Esq.; Canadian Tax Highlights, 1999, Vol. 7, ? 3, © Canadian Tax Foundation.

Since R. v. Norway Insulation Inc., (1995), 23 O.R. (3d) 432 (Gen. Div.), there was a growing (but not unanimous) condemnation in the case law of investigative techniques employed by [CRA] Investiga-tions: "The End Determines the Means", Canadian Tax Highlights, 1997, Vol. 5, ? 7, © Canadian Tax Foundation. The issue was settled in favour of taxpayer rights under §7 of the Charter in R. v. Jarvis, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 757 (S.C.C.) Iacobucci and Major, JJ. at §96.

So the sixth myth of taxation is that CRA is there to help you; they are there to collect taxes for Parliament, any help they give will be incidental to that larger purpose.

What About Your Rights?

If you believe you have a problem with CRA, or if you believe its officers have broken your rights (e.g., §§7, 8, 10(b) or 11(d) of the Charter) to whom, should you complaint?

Unlike most federal government departments CRA doesn't have an Ombudsman, so you cannot go there.

In another abuse case (in which the court excluded the evidence under §24(2) of the Charter), defence attempts to go to supervisors, local TSO directors, national directors, national director-generals, the Commissioner and even the Minister of National Revenue all proved to be ineffective.

CRA publishes Your Rights, but declarations without accountability are meaningless. CRA says that it requires its officers to adhere to a Code of Ethics and Conduct, but then refuses to release a copy so compliance with the Code can be tested.

Natural justice requires that both sides be heard ? audi alteram partem; but what if one side isn't listening? CRA may police the ITA, but "who polices the police?"

In the cases above, only the courts were able to restrain CRA in, what a senior CRA officer characterized as "rebels out there deciding policy" when the indications were that this was an entire SI office that was "out of control" (Roberts & Viccars, above).

While the courts have indicated a willingness to protect Charter rights (R. v. Clayton and Farmer, (2005) Docket No.s C37990; C36722 (Ont. C.A.) per Doherty, J.A. at § 95) they are not the optimal venue for seeking redress for these wrongs; the expense and time involved in such litigation limits access for many. Even an award of costs against the Crown (cf., Saplys, above) would prove to be adequate compensation.

CRA's failure to recognize the dichotomy between their policies and their application is creating a crisis of confidence for many Canadians who believe themselves to have been a victim of a process, which CRA labels as "fair."

If this applies to you then email your Member of Parliament ("MP") and ask them for an Inquiry to establish an Ombudsman for CRA. Your MP's contact information may be found in the Parliamentary directory (http://www.parl.gc.ca/). When you write, please copy the Honourable Paul DeVillers, at [email protected] Mr. DeVillers is Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister and he has expressed an interest in taxpayer equity and rights.

Staff Writer
For Tax Evasion Resources
http://www.taxevasionresources.com

In The News:


Washington Post

Two-thirds say large corporations pay too little in federal taxes (POLL)
ABC News
Cutting corporate taxes looks like a hard sell for Donald Trump and Republican Party leaders -- a new ABC News/Washington Post poll shows that 65 percent of Americans feel large corporations pay too little in taxes. Given what the public knows about it ...
Half of Americans think President Trump's tax plan will favor the wealthyWashington Post
President Trump and Republicans Are Planning Big Tax Cuts for the Rich and CorporationsTIME
Trump's State-Tax Plan Could Cause Headaches for 52 Republican LawmakersBloomberg
Chicago Tribune -CNBC -NBCNews.com -Twitter
all 266 news articles »

CNBC

Trump, Republican tax plan may hit the states and counties that ...
CNBC
A White House proposal to eliminate the tax deduction for state and local taxes would hit Democratic voters hardest, a CNBC analysis shows. As congressional ...
States and city governments say their tax deduction helps middle classWashington Examiner

all 3 news articles »

Palm Beach Post

Why Gardens residents will pay more in taxes
Palm Beach Post
The Council contemplated lowering the tax rate, but officials unanimously decided it would be unwise in the face of a proposed Florida constitutional amendment that would increase the non-school homestead exemption by $25,000 a year. Voters will decide ...


MarketWatch

Opinion: Why the Trump tax plan's fuzzy math​ doesn't add up
MarketWatch
Senate Republicans last week agreed on a budget resolution allowing a $1.5 trillion increase in the federal deficit over the next 10 years from tax legislation. This resolution paves the way for 51 Republican Senators to enact mammoth tax cuts by ...
Cutting taxes for the rich doesn't count as tax reformThe Hill
Here are the big stock winners and losers from the tax reform proposalCNBC
Cross your fingers as Republicans finally launch their tax-cut planNew York Post
Fox News -Washington Examiner
all 35 news articles »

The Recorder

Montague taxes due next month
The Recorder
MONTAGUE — The first half of the Fiscal 2018 Preliminary Real Estate and Fire District taxes are due by Monday, Oct. 2, states a press release from the tax collector's office. Payments received after this date are subject to 14 percent interest ...


USA TODAY

House fails to extend FAA taxes that expire Saturday
USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — The House failed Monday to extend Federal Aviation Administration taxes beyond Saturday because of an unrelated fight over disaster-relief funding. The House voted 245-171 to extend FAA taxes through March 31, to give lawmakers more ...
US House fails to pass FAA extension, hurricane tax reliefReuters

all 18 news articles »

Bucking a trend, Mississippi cities, counties are raising taxes
Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal
City and county leaders supporting the tax increases – many of whom are Republicans straying from a traditional party value of less taxation – are strapped for cash, facing expensive infrastructure upgrades, lacking technology to meet the needs of ...


Washington Post

The Daily 202: Trump's plutocracy problem complicates push for tax cuts
Washington Post
With Breanne Deppisch and Joanie Greve. THE BIG IDEA: Two in three Americans believe that large corporations pay too little in taxes. Only 11 percent of U.S. adults think these businesses pay too much, while 17 percent think they pay their fair share.

and more »

Slate Magazine

One of Ted Cruz's Favorite Ideas to “Simplify” the Tax Code Is Really an Attack on the Corporate Income Tax
Slate Magazine
Expensing sounds like a simple accounting change and is being sold as a way to simplify the tax code. In fact, it represents a direct attack on the idea of a corporate income tax, one that provides a significant and unwarranted tax break to a small ...


TheStreet.com

Stock Futures Mixed as Clarity Sought on North Korea, Taxes, Interest Rates
TheStreet.com
Meanwhile, further information on the Trump administration's highly coveted tax reform plans will finally be made public on Wednesday. President Trump will lay out "new details" in a speech on Wednesday, Sept. 27, White House press secretary Sarah ...

and more »
Google News

Tax Trap #2 -- Double Taxation: Isnt Once Enough?

Have you been thinking about incorporating your small business or... Read More

Back To School ? Educators Deduct School Expenses

As teachers and students head back to school following a... Read More

Highlights of IRS List of 2005 Tax Scams

Each year, the IRS lists various scams taxpayers get caught... Read More

Business Tax Deductions

As we enter mid-March, taxpayers begin to become very interested... Read More

A Taxing Investment

April 15 - The most dreaded day of the year... Read More

Euro Tax Haven Threat

Media reporting of a new EU savings tax directive has... Read More

Understanding Marketing Tax Deductions

Marketing is a necessary expense in running practically any business... Read More

Correspondence From The IRS ? Yikes!

It's a moment every person dreads. You pick up the... Read More

Small Business Tax Issues for Self-Employed Individuals

The United States is a nation of entrepreneurs. There are... Read More

Failure To Pay Employment Taxes ? Penalties

As an employer, you must pay employment taxes if you... Read More

What to Do If You Can?t Pay Your Taxes

The end of tax filing extensions is quickly approaching. What... Read More

Hurricane Katrina ? How To Use Your Business Loss To Get A Refund on 2004 Taxes

With the massive losses caused by Katrina, the economy of... Read More

Tax Investigation - What You Need To Do

The knock on the door from a Tax Inspector is... Read More

Fraudulent Tax Shelters ? KMPG Goes Down Hard

In the largest criminal tax case ever filed, KMPG has... Read More

Insider Guides to IRS Audits!

Ever wish that, as a business owner, you knew exactly... Read More

Are You Overpaying Taxes If You Use Tax Preparation Software?

For many business owners the answer to this quandary is... Read More

The Annual Gift Tax Exclusion: Getting The Edge

Whether helping the kids with a down payment on their... Read More

Tax Tips - Which Tax Form Is Right For Me?

IRS Tax forms can be confusing.Am I a 1099 or... Read More

Truly Bizarre Taxes: The Tax on Illegal Drugs

One can never underestimate the enthusiasm that politicians have for... Read More

How to Reduce the Estate Tax Using the A-B Revocable Living Trust

In a past article I relayed the plight of the... Read More

How Likely Are You To Be Audited?

Statistics for IndividualsUnfortunately, the IRS increased its rate of auditing... Read More

How to Maximize Your Home Business Tax Deductions for 2005

Someone once said, 'the best way to calculate your taxes... Read More

Employment Taxes ? Depositing With The IRS

If your business has employees, you must pay employment taxes.... Read More

Navigating The Internet Sales Tax Laws

QUESTION: I have been contacted by my local city... Read More

About Income Taxes; Tidbits

1812The first attempt to impose an income tax on America... Read More